|Re: [GEMS] Re: Interoperability? [message #376299 is a reply to message #375988]
||Tue, 27 February 2007 05:49
Originally posted by: ljordan.gmx.net|
On 2/26/07, Lars Jordan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Dear Jean,
> GEMS looks very much like what I am looking for - at least when
> looking at the project description. I have already installed it to
> give it a try.
Do not hesitate to contact Jules.
> > This question seems to fall under the [GEMS] component of the GMT
> > http://www.eclipse.org/gmt/gems/
> > I copy this answer to the corresponding newsgroup.
> > The problem of interoperability of EMF models and metamodels
> > with other kinds of models and metamodels (i.e. GME but not only)
> > is a very important one.
> > You may find a report on an initial feasibility study
> > that was made some times ago in:
> > http://www.softmetaware.com/oopsla2005/bezivin2.pdf
> Actually that's a paper I have already come across. It looks very
> interesting. I had a look at the first pages, then put it on my
> "ToBeRead"-Documents. When I had a look at the ATL site I found that
> the most current version targets Eclipse 3.1.2. Is that a problem or
> does it also work with newer versions of eclipse?
Yes M2M/ATL is constantly kept updated.
> > Eclipse is not an island. We need to consider seriously
> > external models as well, by providing convenient import/export
> > Another example of model and metamodel
> > interoperability concerns Microsoft DSL Tools.
> Can you tell me if either of the two tools (GEMS or AMMA) do bridge to
> the MS/DSL MMM? Or if there exists the intention to do so?
Also a proof of feasibility in:
but on a previous version of MS DSL
Should not be hard to adapt,
but currently no plans to do it.
> Thanks for your answer (also in advance).
Thanks for your interesting questions.
Powered by FUDForum
. Page generated in 0.01640 seconds