| Eclipse 4 vs. Eclipse 3.x [message #670914] |
Mon, 16 May 2011 03:43  |
Mike Moor Messages: 20 Registered: November 2010 Location: Steffisburg, Switzerland |
Junior Member |
|
|
hi,
i'm invited to a meeting where they want to decide if we use eclipse 3.x or eclipse 4 for new projects and if we should migrate the existing 3.x applications (about 30 applications) to eclipse 4.
what is your opinion?
i would prefer eclipse 4 for new projects and leave the existing ones on eclipse 3.x.
what are the main eclipse 4 advantages compared to eclipse 3.x?
why should one use eclipse 4 and not eclipse 3.x?
thanks for your feedback
mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse 4 vs. Eclipse 3.x [message #809083 is a reply to message #808837] |
Tue, 28 February 2012 08:11  |
Paul Webster Messages: 6813 Registered: July 2009 Location: Ottawa |
Senior Member |
|
|
I'll just add that even we are in the process of migrating to Eclipse 4 
As part of the Eclipse 4 work, we've only migrated a few services to the Eclipse 4 level. There are still a lot of services used by 3.x RCP apps that live in the 4.2 Workbench (previously called the compatibility layer). Things like Preferences, all the wizards, standard sets of menus and actions, etc, all still live in the 4.2 workbench.
So while I encourage anybody that can use Eclipse 4 to take advantage of it, I wouldn't suggest moving any existing products to Eclipse 4 unless it wasn't consuming a lot of Workbench services *and* it could take advantage of the model or DI technologies.
That's not to say that 3.x RCP apps can't move up to build and run on Eclipse 4.2. With slight modifications they could start taking advantage of the CSS, which has stable API at the SWT level.
PW
PW
Paul Webster
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Platform_Command_Framework
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Command_Core_Expressions
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Menu_Contributions
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.11565 seconds