 defaultValue of an EnumerationLiteral is discarded [message #633511] |
Mon, 18 October 2010 05:47  |
 Tom Brandenburg
Messages: 58
Registered: October 2010
Location: Abstatt, Germany |
Member |
|
|
Hello all,
I have a problem reading Enumeration information in an XMI file exported by an UML conform tool.
The XMI extract looks like this:
<nestedClassifier xmi:type="uml:Enumeration" name="testNestedEnum" xmi:id="BOUML_0x2ca17_4" visibility="package">
<ownedLiteral xmi:type="uml:EnumerationLiteral" name="enumElm1" xmi:id="BOUML_0x29197_1">
<defaultValue xmi:type="uml:LiteralString" xmi:id="BOUML_VALUE_0x29197_1" value="0x55"/>
<ownedComment xmi:type="uml:Comment" xmi:id="COMMENT_2" body="55"/>
</ownedLiteral>
</nestedClassifier>
Eclipse only considers the ownedComment and not the defaultValue. defaultValue is discarded. I want to model something like this:
typedef enum {
enumElm1 = 0x55,
enumElm2 = 0xAA,
} testNestedEnum;
My original XMI header looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xmi:XMI xmi:version="2.1" xmlns:uml="http://schema.omg.org/spec/UML/2.1" xmlns:xmi="http://schema.omg.org/spec/XMI/2.1">
...
And I change it to this, to make it readable for UMLResource:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xmi:XMI xmi:version="2.1" xmlns:xmi="http://schema.omg.org/spec/XMI/2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:Ecore="http://www.eclipse.org/uml2/schemas/Ecore/5" xmlns:uml="http://www.eclipse.org/uml2/3.0.0/UML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.eclipse.org/uml2/schemas/Ecore/5 pathmap://UML_PROFILES/Ecore.profile.uml#_z1OFcHjqEdy8S4Cr8Rc_NA">
...
But I don't know if the latter is quite smart. Does anyone have an idea?
Thanks in advance and best regards
Tom
[Updated on: Mon, 18 October 2010 05:48] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: defaultValue of an EnumerationLiteral is discarded [message #634364 is a reply to message #634348] |
Thu, 21 October 2010 08:09  |
Ed Merks
Messages: 24529
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030209080400030202030108
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Vlad,
Comments below.
Vlad Varnica wrote:
> It is now an old story but friends of our enemies are also our enemies
I wonder if you're presuming to speak for anyone other than just
yourself and I am curious who your enemies might be...
> and could not expect any help from us !!
Omondo's website claims Omondo is an Eclipse partner. In fact, to quote
from http://www.ejb3.org/partners.html
/Omondo partners with Eclipse, OMG and IBM in order to supply the
full Jee modeling cycle software solutions your business needs. /
/Omondo is currently a permanent member of the following
organizations: /
Oddly enough, Eclipse is in that list, yet we both know that Omondo is
in fact not an Eclipse member and hasn't been for years. I wonder then,
if Eclipse is your enemy or your partner? One normally helps partners.
> Good luck in your project but to be honest not really :roll:
With your usual ironic twist, you say something, and then you
immediately contradict it, leaving behind a meaningless void of
nonsense. It's yet another repeat act in your Modeling Comedy Festival;
it's always good to start your day with a chuckle.
> Vlad,
>
>
--------------030209080400030202030108
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Vlad,<br>
<br>
Comments below.<br>
<br>
Vlad Varnica wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:i9p7rp$ia9$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite">It is
now an old story but friends of our enemies are also our enemies</blockquote>
I wonder if you're presuming to speak for anyone other than just
yourself and I am curious who your enemies might be...<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:i9p7rp$ia9$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite"> and
could not expect any help from us !!
<br>
</blockquote>
Omondo's website claims Omondo is an Eclipse partner. In fact, to
quote from <a href="http://www.ejb3.org/partners.html">http://www.ejb3.org/partners.html</a><br>
<blockquote><i>Omondo partners with Eclipse, OMG and IBM in order to
supply the full Jee modeling cycle software solutions your business
needs. </i><br>
<i>Omondo is currently a permanent member of the following
organizations: </i><br>
</blockquote>
Oddly enough, Eclipse is in that list, yet we both know that Omondo is
in fact not an Eclipse member and hasn't been for years. I wonder
then, if Eclipse is your enemy or your partner? One normally helps
partners. <br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:i9p7rp$ia9$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite">Good
luck in your project but to be honest not really :roll: <br>
</blockquote>
With your usual ironic twist, you say something, and then you
immediately contradict it, leaving behind a meaningless void of
nonsense. It's yet another repeat act in your Modeling Comedy
Festival; it's always good to start your day with a chuckle.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:i9p7rp$ia9$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite">Vlad,
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------030209080400030202030108--
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: defaultValue of an EnumerationLiteral is discarded [message #636430 is a reply to message #636411] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 05:43 |
Vlad Varnica
Messages: 546
Registered: July 2009
Location: Milton Keynes - UK |
Senior Member |
|
|
Please refresh your browser 
btw, what is really important is that we need a new initiative based on quality and profitable market and not just based on open source push of unstable projects which then requires hidden consulting additional costs !!
Only integrators and consulting companies can monetize their Eclipse investments today.
This is a non sense and certainly not a win / win strategy for ISV targeting the eclipse plugin market.
Except the embedded market which only uses Eclipse for packaging purposes the java plugin market is dead today.
[Updated on: Mon, 01 November 2010 06:01] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02036 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
And yes, it looks like, as if it is a deviation from the spec, although I thought that this tool (BOUML) is very strict regarding complying UML spec 
