| UML2 and the OMG Model Interchange Working Group (MIWG) [message #655681] |
Tue, 22 February 2011 04:45  |
Thomas Neustupny Messages: 75 Registered: October 2009 |
Member |
|
|
I'm wondering if the development of UML2 and the MIWG activities in http://www.omgwiki.org/model-interchange/doku.php are somehow related.
My impression is that only commercial tools are participating in the MIWG, and UML2 is more or less represented by Ken Hussey from IBM via the IBM RSx tool. The rest of the UML2 world seems to pretty much ignore the MIWG. So, are any fixes for UML2 regarding interchangeability indirecly committed by IBM developers (or others I'm not aware of)?
On the other hand, it might be possible that UML2 considers itself as a de facto standard because of the amount of tools using it, so that the MIWG is considered as a competitor (from the closed-source side of the UML tools world).
Thanks for helping me to get a clearer picture about what's going on behind the scenes.
|
|
|
|
| Re: UML2 and the OMG Model Interchange Working Group (MIWG) [message #656254 is a reply to message #655681] |
Thu, 24 February 2011 13:13  |
Thomas Neustupny Messages: 75 Registered: October 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Hi Vlad,
thanks for your reply, so you think there's no need to care about anything outside the eclipse UML2 world. Hm. And you reminded me of that other topic: model interchange vs. diagram interchange. I consider the latter far from being solved, but that's another topic.
I still would like to understand if there are any contributions to UML2 and EMF that are an outcome of MIWG results. Nobody here nor in their mailing list mention if changes are made to the tools because of interchange issues. (BTW, are there changelogs to UML2 in the web?)
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04324 seconds