|
| Re: Licensing - Apache Compatible with GPLv3. Will EPL? [message #45981 is a reply to message #45960] |
Fri, 01 June 2007 10:19   |
|
Originally posted by: alex_blewitt.yahoo.com
Note that Apache haven't said anything on the subject yet. As such, the GPLv3 isn't necessarily compatible; you're just hearing one side.
There still seems to be some debate about it, by the way. Even if they are compatible, it doesn't hold that compatibility is transitive. A male plug can join a female socket; a female socket can join a male plug; but that doesn't mean that a male plug can join a male plug.
Alex.
|
|
|
| Re: Licensing - Apache Compatible with GPLv3. Will EPL? [message #46004 is a reply to message #45981] |
Fri, 01 June 2007 10:26   |
|
Originally posted by: alex_blewitt.yahoo.com
NB
1) you should always ask *your* lawyer. Doesn't matter what other lawyers think.
2) I'm not associated with the foundation, and I'm not answering for anyone other than me.
3) Even if the GPL and AL are compatible, I strongly doubt that anyone at Eclipse wants to use anything other than EPL or would consider doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Licensing - Apache Compatible with GPLv3. Will EPL? [message #46095 is a reply to message #46064] |
Fri, 08 June 2007 11:46  |
Mike Milinkovich Messages: 258 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Duh. Sorry. My name wasn't set when I wrote that post.
Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director
Eclipse Foundation
"eclipse.org" <mike.milinkovich@eclipse.org> wrote in message
news:f4bseu$tia$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I can tell you that we *are* looking at GPLv3 to see if there are ways that
>the EPL could be compatible with it. So far, no joy. But I do think it's an
>intriguing opportunity so its worth the time and effort to investigate
>thoroughly.
>
> Hell will freeze over before we switch from the EPL to the GPL, regardless
> of what it says in the article[1] linked to from Wikipedia. Disregarding
> any philosophical differences, as a practical matter it is impossible. The
> way the EPL and the Eclipse Foundation works means that the original
> authors retain ownership of the materials and we would need their written
> permission to switch licenses. When we switched from CPL to EPL we went
> and asked every single contributor to agree to the change. That was really
> hard. And three years ago we had a lot less code and a lot fewer projects
> than we have now.
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_(software)#_note-3
>
> "Darren Bell" <djb@dolby.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:f3ojdm$btt$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Now that the FSF have announced that the GPLv3 License will be compatible
>> with ASFv2, will the EPL be compatible. If it can be, then this will be
>> a BIG plus.
>>
>> Someone care to comment?
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02307 seconds