Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Eclipse Process Manager (Stardust) » Building Stardust
Building Stardust [message #1015259] Wed, 27 February 2013 17:18 Go to next message
Oliver Kopp is currently offline Oliver Kopp
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2011
Junior Member
Hi,

I'm trying to follow the build instructions. However, I get following error:

  [javac] /home/iaas3/stardust/engine/stardust-engine-base/target/src/org/eclipse/stardust/common/config/extensions/PojoExtensionsCache.java:88: compareAndSet(T,T) in java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference<T> cannot be applied to (<nulltype>,java.lang.Object)
  [javac]             sharedInstance.compareAndSet(null, instantiatePojoExtension(instanceType));
  [javac]                           ^


What's going wrong? I tried both Win8 and Ubuntu 12.04.

What I want to try is the web-based BPMN modeller. Is there a more easy way to get that up and running isolated from the other components?

Cheers,

Oliver
Re: Building Stardust [message #1015293 is a reply to message #1015259] Thu, 28 February 2013 01:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sven Rottstock is currently offline Sven Rottstock
Messages: 6
Registered: December 2012
Junior Member
Hi Oliver,

may I ask you on which branch you're working? The current active ones are b_dev_0_7_1 for Helios and I_4_3 for Kepler driven builds. And points the environment variable JAVA_HOME to a JDK 1.6?

Cheers,
Sven
Re: Building Stardust [message #1015306 is a reply to message #1015293] Thu, 28 February 2013 02:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sven Rottstock is currently offline Sven Rottstock
Messages: 6
Registered: December 2012
Junior Member
I've started a nightly build based on master (https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/stardust-7-nightly/178/console) to ensure if the project is still compiling. And it is. So your issue seems to be a local one.
Oliver, could you provide more informations how you have started the build which environment variables are set. Also a more detailed stacktrace would be great.

If you like you can also send me these informations via mail.

Regards,
Sven
Re: Building Stardust [message #1015436 is a reply to message #1015293] Thu, 28 February 2013 10:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oliver Kopp is currently offline Oliver Kopp
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2011
Junior Member
Hi Sven,

Sven Rottstock wrote on Thu, 28 February 2013 01:20
may I ask you on which branch you're working?


I assume, it's the master branch: The build instructions do not seem to select another branch

Sven Rottstock wrote on Thu, 28 February 2013 01:20
And points the environment variable JAVA_HOME to a JDK 1.6?


No, it's JDK 1.7 as Java SE 1.6 hit its End of Public Updates this month. See www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html (I cannot do real links as I have less than 5 posts)

Does Stardust have an IRC channel? I found nothing on Freenode.

Cheers,

Oliver
Re: Building Stardust [message #1015535 is a reply to message #1015436] Fri, 01 March 2013 02:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Robert Emsbach is currently offline Robert Emsbach
Messages: 55
Registered: October 2011
Location: Shanghai
Member

Hi Oliver,

so far Stardust does not have an IRC channel. This would a good thing to have once there is sufficient demand. However, you are most welcome to connect with Stardust on Facebook and via this forum.

Obviously you have a good point with regards to the public updates to Java 6. In the customer base we had very little demand for Java 7 support so far, but I am sure that will change soon as Oracle increases the pressure. A move to Java 7 is needed and in planning but we are not there yet. As I hope you can also appreciate currently the participation in the Eclipse Kepler milestones and eventually in the release is our highest priority. For the time being please use Java 6 to build Stardust.

Best regards

Robert


[Updated on: Fri, 01 March 2013 02:40]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Building Stardust [message #1019485 is a reply to message #1015293] Fri, 15 March 2013 16:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oliver Kopp is currently offline Oliver Kopp
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2011
Junior Member
Sven Rottstock wrote on Thu, 28 February 2013 01:20

The current active ones are b_dev_0_7_1 for Helios and I_4_3 for Kepler driven builds.


As I'm using Juno, neither I run Helios nor Kepler.

Now, I downloaded Kepler. When reading some git history, I think, I can stay on the master branch and don't have to switch to the "I_4_3" branch, do I?

Cheers,

Oliver
Project names [message #1020271 is a reply to message #1015259] Sun, 17 March 2013 15:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oliver Kopp is currently offline Oliver Kopp
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2011
Junior Member
I wonder why the ".mobile" projects have the same names as the projects without ".mobile". I cannot import both in eclipse. Is this intended?
Re: Project names [message #1020320 is a reply to message #1020271] Sun, 17 March 2013 18:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oliver Kopp is currently offline Oliver Kopp
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2011
Junior Member
Currently, I'm starting with stardust-web-modeler and stardust-web-modeler-bpmn2. When a package is not found, I try file-based search and trying to add the required project. Currently, I'm stuck at "stardust-engine-core", which requires "org.tranql.connector.AllExceptionsAreFatalSorter". Although the build succeeded, this import cannot be resolved.
Re: Project names [message #1021181 is a reply to message #1020320] Tue, 19 March 2013 12:05 Go to previous message
Robert Emsbach is currently offline Robert Emsbach
Messages: 55
Registered: October 2011
Location: Shanghai
Member

Oliver,

not sure if you are working on Keppler or Juno now. If you use Juno then you need to create a Helios target platform and use this for compilation (Preferences / Plug-in Development / Target Platform). In that case you can stay on master, which is Helios.

Stardust will skip Juno and focus on Keppler, hence we don't test Juno.

You do not require .mobile.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you encounter any further issues or have other questions.

Best regards

Robert
Previous Topic:Unable to load Derby EmbeddedDriver even though it's in the classpath
Next Topic:Sysconsole utility
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 18 08:13:53 EDT 2013

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02235 seconds